assignment based on a logical argumentation

Question:

the assignment is write a two-page assignment based on a logical argumentation steps.1. Identify the issue2. Present the premises3. Present an address counter argument4. Conclusion and summary5. References.
select issues from newspapers, Internet, personal life, school, or any other issue. The logical argument should be include. Clearly defined issue, present the premise that supports the conclusion. Present and respond to counter arguments from the other side of the issue. Make sure you include your logical argument and provide a summary. Be sure to clearly cite your resources, using the format quote you are using author, publication, year, page number.

Answer:

Should Recreational Drugs Be Legalised?

Introduction

Many arguments have been developed over the years regarding recreational drugs. Consumers use these drugs to attain a sense of pleasure and not for medicinal functions. Most of these drugs such as cocaine, heroine, cannabis and LSD are illegal. Many countries have agencies that work on controlling drug use. However, today the usage is very rampant. A lot of money is spent on the war against drugs in many societies (Maich, 2004).

Premise of the Argument

Legalising recreational drugs is a reasonable decision when it comes to protecting the society. If such laws are passed, it is a choice made by each individual to determine their actions. These laws need to be passed with clauses that support education on the effects of using recreational drugs. Legalising the drugs in a controlled, safe environment will result to good judgement on the part of every individual. Strict standards of distribution and buying like those of tobacco and alcohol will ensure people make personal decisions whether to use drugs or not (Cussen & Block, 2000, pp. 527-529).

Illegality of these drugs has resulted in pointless risks for many consumers. Many people use these drugs even though they are illegal and therefore, it would make sense to allow the drugs in a controlled environment. The quantity and doses of the drugs are measured through criminal activities resulting in deaths from overdosing. However, once legalised, drug doses can be monitored to ensure safety of consumers. The illegality of recreational drugs also encourages criminal activities in many countries. Terrorist groups get a leeway to fund illegal activities like gangs whilst once legalised, genuine organisations will be responsible for the business (Maich, 2004).

The economy has also suffered greatly because of illegality of these drugs. This is because there is a lot of money spent on drug prohibition for a large network that is growing rapidly. Drug lords have strong networks, corruption of law enforcers, and a wide crime rate connected to drug use. Research indicates that revoking laws legalising the drugs has increased drug intake by 350%. For instance, Bratain heroin consumers have shot up by forty folds and many cases of addiction have been reported (Cussen, & Block, 2000, pp. 528-530).

Inference that counter Drug legalisation

It is difficult to suggest that drug use is all right to any person. Recreational drugs pose adverse effects on the physical and mental health of consumers. This is especially so because these drugs may be taken in small quantities but in the end, might result to appalling effects on the body. If drug use is legalised, it will convey the message that drug use is not harmful or is less dangerous than it was previously assumed. This will lead to use of drugs by many more people posing the danger of addictions within societies. Thus, the idea of having a personal choice is overcome by the danger of health problems that may follow (Ricaurte & McCann, 2005, p. 218).

There is a great risk for consuming recreational drugs within the societal structures. This is because; recreational drugs do not offer the body any meaningful benefit that warrants legalising. They also have no benefit to the society in any direct way that will ensure that things remain orderly. Many drug takers are not able to function properly in workplaces consequently, reducing productivity in the society. The drugs are addictive, and many find it difficult to stop thus more money is spent in rehabilitation centres. The other major disadvantage is the fact that, once these drugs are legalised, it may open doors for more dangerous substances in the market (Steeves, 2011).

Conclusion and Summary

The above arguments show that the drug problem is very complex. It is clear that drug use is harmful, and a damage it poses overshadows all benefits. Drugs also lead to poor output in workplaces and this will greatly affect the economy. Personal choices in using drugs are always overshadowed by harmful consequences that result. People who use drugs affect not only the society, but also the immediate loved ones surrounding them. The conclusion is that drugs should not be legalised, rather countries should put strict measures to curb drug use.


References

Cussen, M., & Block, W. (2000). Legalize Drugs Now!. American Journal Of Economics & Sociology, 59(3), 525.

Maich, S. (2004). A Case for Marijuana Inc. Maclean’s, 117(47), 42.

Ricaurte, G. A., & McCann, U. D. (2005). Recognition and management of complications of new recreational drug use. Lancet, 365(9477), 2137-2145. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66737-2.

Steeves, R. (2011). Recognising Drug abuse at Work. Occupational Health, 63(9), 27-30.

About the Author Doris C. Chesser